<\/p>\n
The Supreme Court on Monday sought details of the military trials of civilians for their alleged involvement in the violent events of May 9.<\/p>\n
Today, a six-member bench \u2014 led by Justice Aminuddin Khan and including Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Syed Azhar Hasan Rizvi, Justice Shahid Waheed, Justice Musarrat Hilali and Justice Irfan Saadat Khan \u2014 resumed hearing a set of intra-court appeals (ICAs) against its Oct 23 unanimous ruling<\/a> nullifying the military trials of civilians.<\/p>\n The case pertains to the trial of 103 civilians<\/a> for their alleged role in attacks on army installations during the riots<\/a> that followed ex-premier Imran Khan\u2019s arrest<\/a> on May 9 last year.<\/p>\n In a widely praised ruling<\/a> last year, a five-member SC bench \u2014 comprising Justices Ijazul Ahsan, Munib Akhtar, Yahya Afridi, Syed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi and Ayesha Malik \u2014 had unanimously declared<\/a> that trying the accused civilians in military courts was ultra vires the Constitution.<\/p>\n The apex court had declared that the accused would not be tried in military courts but in criminal courts of competent jurisdiction established under the ordinary or special law of the land.<\/p>\n On December 13, in a 5-1 majority verdict, the SC conditionally suspended<\/a> its Oct 23 ruling, pending a final judgment as it heard a set of ICAs<\/a>.<\/p>\n The appeals against the verdict had been filed by the then-caretaker federal government<\/a> as well as the provincial ones in Balochistan<\/a>, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa<\/a> and Punjab<\/a>. Sindh had denied<\/a> filing a purported plea<\/a> on the same matter and was not included among the petitions taken up earlier. The defence ministry<\/a> had also moved an ICA, requesting the apex court to suspend the verdict\u2019s operation during the pendency of the appeal.<\/p>\n In January, a petition was filed<\/a> by Faisal Siddiqui on behalf of some of those challenging the trials to restrain federal and provincial governments from engaging a private counsel to plead the matter.<\/p>\n At the last hearing on Jan 29, Justice Sardar Tariq Masood, who has since retired, referred the ICAs back to a three-judge committee for the constitution of a larger bench.<\/p>\n On March 19, former CJP Jawwad S. Khawaja, who is one of the petitioners<\/a> to challenge the military trials, had requested<\/a> the apex court for an early hearing of the appeals, contending that the continued presence of civilians in military custody was \u201cbeyond compensation\u201d.<\/p>\n Today, Khawaja Ahmed appeared before the court as the counsel for ex-CJP Khawaja while Attorney General for Pakistan (AGP) Mansoor Usman Awan and KP Additional Advocate General (AAG) Syed Kausar Ali Shah were also present.<\/p>\n Salman Akram Raja and Faisal Siddiqui appeared as the counsels for their clients who had challenged the trials while Aitzaz Ahsan<\/a>, who was also one of the petitioners, was also present.<\/p>\n The KP government requested the court to withdraw its appeal<\/a> against the Oct 23 verdict, presenting a resolution passed by the provincial cabinet.<\/p>\n The Supreme Court ordered AGP Awan to furnish the details of the verdicts reserved by the military courts till March 28 and adjourned the hearing till then.<\/p>\n At the outset of the hearing, Justice Khawaja\u2019s counsel objected to the size of the bench.<\/p>\n \u201c103 suspects are in custody. Their families want to be included in the case proceedings,\u201d Ahmed said, urging the court to allow the suspects\u2019 families to witness the case proceedings.<\/p>\n To this, Justice Khan replied that the courtroom was fully occupied, adding, \u201cThere is no objection on [the families] coming to the court; we will see this matter.\u201d<\/p>\n Justice Khawaja\u2019s counsel further requested the SC to constitute a nine-member larger bench to hear the ICAs. Ahmed argued that his client had sought the same in his petition. \u201cIt is my request to the court to urge the SC committee to constitute a nine-member bench,\u201d he said.<\/p>\nThe hearing<\/h2>\n