PHC reserves verdict on ECP’s appeal against restoration of PTI’s electoral symbol

PHC reserves verdict on ECP’s appeal against restoration of PTI’s electoral symbol

The Peshawar High Court on Tuesday reserved its verdict on review pleas filed by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) against the PHC’s decision to suspend the electoral watchdog’s declaration of PTI’s intra-party polls as void and the re­vocation of its election symbol.

On December 22, the ECP had decided against letting PTI retain its iconic ‘bat’ symbol for the February 8 general election, saying that the party had failed to hold intra-party polls — which saw Barrister Gohar Khan becoming the PTI chairman — in accordance with its prevailing constitution and election laws.

Subsequently, the PTI had approached the PHC. Last week, the court had suspended the ECP’s declaration of the PTI’s intra-party polls as unconstitutional as well as the subsequent revocation of the party’s iconic symbol.

It had also noted that general elections were scheduled for February 8 and the last date for allotment of election symbols was January 13.

On Saturday, the ECP had filed a review petition in the PHC against the suspension of its decision to declare PTI’s intra-party polls as void and not let the party retain its ‘bat’ electoral symbol.

During the hearing today, presided by Justice Ejaz Khan, ECP counsel Sikandar Mohmand appeared in court.

At the outset, the judge inquired if the Supreme Court had passed orders that directives issued by a high court applied to the entire country.

“Absolutely. The SC suspended the Lahore High Court’s decision regarding returning officers,” the lawyer replied. He elaborated that the judgment was suspended under a unilateral decision.

“The second point is that the interim relief and final plea are the same,” he added. At one point, the judge asked where the petitioner in the case was to which the ECP counsel said he was unaware.

Justice Khan also stated that he could not issue an order in the case as it was fixed before a division bench on Jan 9. However, the ECP lawyer said he only wanted the court to withdraw the PHC order, adding that arguments would be presented before the division bench.

Subsequently, the court reserved its verdict.

Scroll to Top